How you can help create 10,400 new jobs in Washington State by 2020

I am for economic growth. Now, this shouldn’t be an earth-shattering surprise to you, few people are against growth. However, you might encounter people who are for economic growth, but against immigration. Here is why that is a juxtaposition.

In many ways, immigration equals economic growth. Don’t take my word for it, look at the facts:

  • 40% of fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children (source).
  • Immigrants start ¼ of technology and engineering companies in the U.S even though they only represent ⅛ of the population (source).
  • In 2012, immigrant-founded engineering and technology companies employed 560,000 workers and generated $63 billion in sales nationwide (source)

These are impressive numbers. To top it up, here are three concrete examples of successful immigrants:

  • Jan Koum, born in Ukraine, and co-founder of Whatsapp, which was recently sold to Facebook for $19 billion.
  • Jerry Yang, co-founder of Yahoo and born in Taiwan. Yahoo’s market cap: $37 billion
  • Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google and born in Russia. Google’s market cap: $379 billion.

This country is built on immigration, our history and our heritage has created a culture and a narrative that is unparalleled by any other nation. The U.S. is where smart people from other nations come to prove themselves, and this brings economic growth for everyone. But, we don’t just need talented immigrants to start companies, we also need them to meet the huge demand from already established American companies.  

More than one-fourth of science and engineering firms already report difficulty hiring, and this is only going to get worse. Over the last 10 years, jobs in STEM have grown three times as fast as jobs in the rest of the economy, but the number of Americans studying STEM is growing by less than 1% per year (Source: ESA & McKinsey). The U.S. is facing a projected shortfall of more than 200,000 advanced-degree STEM jobs by 2018 (Source)

As a country, we can’t compete on salaries levels, but we can compete in terms of knowledge and innovation. Unfortunately, the current immigration laws are inhibiting our competitiveness. The latest round of applications for H-1B visas for high-skilled workers exceeded the annual limit within a week. 172,500 H-1B petitions were filed for 85,000 visas, the highest number ever recorded for H-1B demand (Source). Keep in mind, these are company-sponsored visas and thus a reflection of a real demand.  

FWD.us and The Partnership for a New American Economy (PNAE) are working on convincing Congress to accelerate an immigration reform and keeping America’s tech sector competitive. As part of this effort, FWD.us and PNAE are organizing 12 events all over the country during the last two weeks of April. Techstars Seattle is hosting one of these events.

Join us, and local entrepreneurs, investors, and leaders for a conversation on why immigration reform is critical to the tech and start-up communities in Seattle. The event takes place on Tuesday April 22 from 6pm - 8pm at 511 Boren Ave N, Seattle.  See who is on the panel and register here: http://pnae.us/icodesea

If you can’t attend, help us spread the word on Twitter (click to tweet), and if you are an entrepreneur or an investor, sign the letters urging Congress to advance immigration reform.

If we succeed, an expansion of the high-skilled visa program would create an estimated 10,400 new jobs in Washington by 2020.


- Andy

A Techstar’s retrospective: a CEO looks back at the benefits of the program

It is Friday morning and I am meeting with Avi Cavale a Techstars alumni from the 2013 class. Avi is the co-founder and CEO of Shippable - a hosted continuous integration and deployment service, that helps developers ship code faster. Avi was leading a team of 150 developers in his position as Product Unit Manager at Microsoft before starting Shippable in August 2012. 

I walk into Cherry Street Coffee House and sit down with Avi just as he is finishing a meeting with Jonathan Reichhold, a Techstars mentor. Jonathan started Twitter’s Seattle office and scaled the service. Now, Avi is benefitting from Jonathan' knowledge in his own effort to scale Shippable. This time it is my turn to hear about Avi’s experience with Techstars and how he made the decision to start Shippable after spending 11 years at Microsoft.

What made you take the step from a secure job at Microsoft to starting your own company?
I was managing 150 developers in China, India, and the U.S. working on Kinect. By the end of it we were working 20 hour days, it was sort of crazy. I realized I was just a small minion in a big machinery. Even though I worked on a successful product like Kinect, I didn’t feel that our team's impact was significant enough to matter to Microsoft as a whole.

When the project came to an end there was a reorganization going on. Usually, if you take a new leading position after one of these larger changes, you commit yourself to another 3-4 years. I figured it would take me a long time to reach a position where I would have a real impact and decided it was a good time to make the shift. 

What scared you the most about making this change?
I was most afraid of not knowing how to run a startup. I was afraid of failing, because when you start your own company it all depends on you. I decided to join Uhuru Software, a small startup, to learn about entrepreneurship before starting my own.

How did you come up with the idea for Shippable and what made you start it?
While working at Uhuru, I learned a lot about open source. I was fascinated by how quickly a team of 50 developers scattered around the globe could get things done without ever seeing each other. It was a big contrast to my experience at Microsoft, where it was a very slow and tedious process to ship code. I decided to focus on open source techniques to help developers ship code faster. 

How did you build your team?
I needed a co-founder with development experience and business acumen. Manisha had a lot experience as a developer and had obtained an MBA from UC Berkeley. I knew her from Microsoft days and thought she would be perfect for the job. Luckily, I convinced her to help start Shippable. 

Tell me about the progress of Shippable, from starting out to joining Techstars. 
I left my job at Uhuru in August 2012 to work on Shippable. In December 2012 we started programming and had an early beta ready in March 2013. I wanted Geekwire to write about our release, but I didn’t know how to get news coverage. I saw that Geekwire was having a ping pong tournament and decided to join. Not only did I manage to win the tournament and get Geekwire’s attention, I also met Greg Gottesman from Madrona Venture Group. Greg helped with a lot of free advice and guidance. He recommended me to meet with Techstars and helped me with introduction. 

What made you apply to Techstars?
I met withTechstars and quickly learned that we were approaching the problem in the wrong way. We had already realized that our product didn’t resonate with potential customers. We had built a product that solved my pain but not that of our customers. Just because you have a pain, that doesn’t mean everybody else are having the same experience. We didn’t really know if we were solving a significant pain for developers. Techstars helped us realize that.

Techstars gave real and honest feedback, and I quickly learned what they thought of us and our product - good and bad. You never got that kind of feedback at Microsoft, so it was a refreshing change. Techstar’s approach helped us improve a lot and that persuaded me to apply.

I also saw Techstars as an opportunity to reduce risk. Most startups fail, so your job is to mitigate risk. Getting access to mentors and connections increases your likelihood of success. You join a family where everyone helps each other and everyone is cheering you on. 

What was Techstars like for you?
Techstars is like being a rock star for three months. You become part of this tightly knit network and have everyone cheering for you and helping you succeed, but it is also intense learning. I often compare it to going back to kindergarten, in the sense that you learn so much in such a short time. We would have lectures from experts on how to acquire users, do marketing, or get funding. As an example we had Dan Shapiro, who has sold two tech companies (one to Google), give the Techstars class advice on how to succeed as a tech-company. 

Were you not worried about giving up equity to Techstars?
The 6% equity that Techstars takes isn’t remotely expensive. On the contrary I think it is mind-boggling what you get in return; mentorship, connections, advice, and access to venture capital. Techstars doesn’t even require preferred shares or a board seat. If you went elsewhere, you wouldn’t get those kind of terms. 

If you need to do fundraising at some point, I believe you have to go through Techstars. It will increase your valuation and likelihood of success. I didn’t have any experience fundraising, but Techstars teaches you how, and when you have offers, Techstars is an open forum where you can always ask for advice.

You also have to remember, it is in your best interest to give up equity to Techstars. You want to have as many friends of the company as possible, and when your friends have a bit of skin in the game, they are more likely to help you.

What do you wish you had known before joining the program?
You have to be super organized. You cannot drop the ball during those three months. I learned that lesson when I met with one of our mentors one week before the program started. I showed up unprepared, expecting it would just be a meet and greet. I hadn’t even brought a notepad and a pen. The meeting resulted in him telling me off for not being prepared and not taking it seriously. I learned my lesson, and throughout the program we were always on top of things. I think we were the only group who never missed a meeting with a mentor. 

What was the best part of Techstars?
The best part of Techstars is the passion, excitement, and how much time mentors spend with you. They sit down on a weekly basis and share their advice, experience, and even their entrepreneurial horror stories. One of our mentors was Darrel Cavens, CEO of Zulily, who would spend an hour with us almost every week despite his busy schedule. You don’t get that kind of access anywhere else.  

What is your advice to people who are considering applying for Techstars? 
You absolutely have to apply. 

 

Applications for Techstars class of 2014 opened on March 17. Apply Now! 
Early deadline is April 13 and the final deadline is May 4. 

- Andy

How not to name your company

A couple days ago I talked about why it’s so hard to name your company, it's harder to name an existing company than I had thought. Coming up with a new name for RevenueLoan lead me down some funny paths. Throughout the process the team and I got frustrated enough that we tried some random strategies to keep the process fun and lighthearted. Some weird things we tried:

1) Roll the dice

2) Riff on James Bond movies

3) Name after your intern

Roll the dice

At one point, we had reduced the list of possible company names down to 3 names, all of which we decided were "good enough". After spending too many hours sitting around and debating the pros and cons of each name, I wrote the names on 3 slips of paper, crumpled them up, and threw them on the ground. The plan was to name the company with the name on the first piece of paper I picked up. I picked the first one up, read it aloud, and as I did....I changed the rules of the roll the dice game. I knew instantly that the first name was not the name I wanted and said "no, that's not it". And then there were two crumbled up pieces of paper and I declared that we were now in a roll the dice process of elimination game for the name.  I picked the second piece of crumbled paper and the second company name didn't feel that good either.  And low and behold, the third name felt pretty good. So I went with it. We announced to the team that we were [name on crumpled paper #3] (to be announced).

An hour later, I was driving home, and I decided I didn't like the name. So I sent an email to everyone saying I was having brand remorse and we needed to go back to the drawing board. Ugg. I was totally indecisive and was dragging everyone through a terrible process. I felt crappy.

Takeaway: Using the roll the dice strategy actually can work.  I just wouldn't commit to which ever one you pick first or last (too much chance)....rather, I'd suggest picking them with an idea that the last one you pick is the right name and then watch your emotional reaction to the names that you pick first or second. If you feel instant regret that the 3rd name is the name that chance picked for you then you probably have the wrong name. In other words, let your immediate reaction to the names shed light on which company name you choose. And whatever name you decide on using this process, sit on the name for at least a day before you just go without it. And it's OK to try again.

Riff on James Bond movies

Yes, this was something we tried. Basically, we plugged "Fund" into a bunch of James Bond movie titles. We came up with the following names

The Fund who Loved Me.

The Spy who Funded me.

Dr. Fund.

You Only Fund Twice.

Live and Let Fund.

You see where this went. Right into the toilet.

Takeaway: In a funny way, we had fun doing this and the names provided some comic relief. We actually liked a couple of the names - Funderball and The Man with the Golden Fund, but ultimately it was too bizarre for us to use as our actual company name.

Name after your intern

Kenton is an awesome developer working for us this summer before he goes to graduate school. In lieu of having an actual name, we began to refer to ourselves as Kenton, or The Kenton Group, or Kenton Financial. There were 2 problems with naming it Kenton - the first problem is that the story wouldn't exactly work. With Judy's Book , the name made sense - it was my mother in law's name and the site was inspired by her book of trusted local services. The second problem is that it sure can get confusing having an employee and a company with the same name - we imagined not knowing who or what we were talking about!

These tactics didn't exactly work for what we’re calling "the company formerly known as RevenueLoan" but they did help us keep our minds open and keep the process fun, or at least less sucky!